Prohibits federal funds from being given to any facility that denies treatment to someone based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.
Erin Houchin
Representative
IN-9
The COVID-19 Vaccination Non-Discrimination Act prohibits federal funds from being allocated to any entity that refuses to provide treatment to an individual based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. This includes funds authorized by federal law or from any trust fund receiving federal authorization, including those provided under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act.
The "COVID-19 Vaccination Non-Discrimination Act" aims to cut off federal funds to any healthcare facility that refuses to treat someone because of their COVID-19 vaccination status. This covers all sorts of federal money, including funds authorized by federal law and trust funds that get federal backing, like those under the Social Security Act (Titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI). Basically, if a facility gets federal dollars, it can't turn away patients based on whether or not they've had the COVID-19 shot.
The core idea here is to ensure everyone has equal access to medical care, regardless of their vaccination status. This bill means that a federally-funded hospital or clinic can't deny treatment to someone simply because they haven't been vaccinated against COVID-19. For example, imagine a rural clinic that receives federal grants – under this law, they couldn't refuse to see a patient for a broken arm just because that patient hasn't received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is a straightforward application to ensure healthcare access isn't tied to vaccination status.
How would this work in practice? Say a local hospital gets a chunk of its funding from federal sources. If they have a policy of only treating vaccinated individuals, they'd lose that federal money. This could impact their budget for everything from equipment purchases to staff salaries. The bill doesn't specify an exact start date, but once it's effective, the change is immediate for any facility receiving federal funds. This isn't about forcing anyone to get vaccinated; it's about making sure everyone can get medical care, regardless of their personal choice about the COVID-19 vaccine.
While the goal is clear, there could be some bumps in the road. For instance, what exactly counts as "denial of treatment"? Could a facility claim they're not denying treatment, but just prioritizing vaccinated patients? This might lead to some legal back-and-forth to nail down the specifics. Also, enforcing this could be a challenge. It would require some serious oversight to make sure facilities are actually following the rules and not finding loopholes. The bill doesn't lay out exactly how this oversight would work, which is something to keep an eye on.