This Act amends federal law to set the repayment obligation for the Arkansas Valley Conduit project in Colorado at 35% of the total cost, with flexible terms for the remaining balance.
Lauren Boebert
Representative
CO-4
The Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act revises the federal cost-sharing requirements for the Arkansas Valley Conduit project in Colorado. It mandates that repayment for the conduit will equal 35% of the total cost, with flexible repayment terms for local entities based on financial hardship. Furthermore, the bill ensures local parties assume full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the water system.
This bill, officially called the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act, is laser-focused on changing the financial rules for a specific water infrastructure project in Colorado—the Arkansas Valley Conduit. Essentially, it’s a rewrite of the bill’s funding contract, locking in how much the federal government will pay and how the local folks have to pay back the rest. The headline change is that the federal government’s required payment is fixed at 35% of the total cost, overriding any other existing reclamation laws that might have calculated the share differently. This provides certainty on the federal side of the ledger right now.
For the remaining 65% of the project cost, the bill offers a serious break—but only if the communities can prove they need it. The bill allows the repayment period to stretch out for up to 75 years, which is a massive extension. This lengthy repayment, however, is conditional: it only kicks in if the Secretary (of the Interior, presumably) determines the communities are facing “financial hardship.” If that hardship is proven, they also get a reduced interest rate, set at just 50% of the standard rate the Treasury usually charges. Think of it like getting a 75-year mortgage on your house at half the standard rate, but only if you can prove to the bank you’re barely scraping by. This provision (Section 2) is clearly designed to make the initial cost of the project more manageable for local water districts and municipalities.
Here’s where the policy gets real for the people who actually live there. While the bill offers short-term financial relief on the construction costs, it completely shifts the long-term burden. The contract must make sure that the local parties—the cities, towns, and water districts—take on full responsibility for the care, operation, maintenance, and replacement of the entire conduit system (Section 2). This means that once the conduit is built, every single future repair, routine maintenance cost, and eventual system replacement is entirely on the local entities. The federal government is essentially saying, “We’ll help build it, but once the ribbon is cut, it’s all yours.”
For residents and businesses in the Arkansas Valley, this bill is a trade-off. On one hand, the fixed 35% federal share and the potential for a 75-year, low-interest repayment plan means the water project is more likely to get finished without immediate, massive rate hikes. This is good news for your wallet in the short term. However, the requirement that local entities cover 100% of the future Operations, Maintenance, and Replacement (OM&R) costs is a ticking time bomb. A major pipe break 30 years from now, or the need to replace a massive pump station, could result in huge, unexpected costs that the local water boards would have to cover entirely. This risk could translate into significant, unpredictable rate spikes down the road for homeowners and local businesses, especially if the local water authority hasn't adequately saved for these capital expenses. It’s a classic infrastructure funding strategy: pay less now, assume all the risk later.