PolicyBrief
H.R. 1283
119th CongressFeb 13th 2025
Protecting Our Children in an AI World Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill aims to combat AI-generated child pornography by removing legal defenses and broadening the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" to include simulated depictions.

Gus Bilirakis
R

Gus Bilirakis

Representative

FL-12

LEGISLATION

AI Child Pornography Bill Tightens Legal Screws: "Protecting Our Children in an AI World Act of 2025"

The "Protecting Our Children in an AI World Act of 2025" directly tackles the emerging threat of AI-generated child pornography. This bill updates existing laws to specifically address this new technology, closing loopholes and strengthening protections for children. The core change? It removes a legal defense previously available in child pornography cases and expands the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" to include realistic, AI-generated depictions.

Zeroing in on AI Exploitation

This law is all about adapting to the rapid advancements in AI. Previously, Section 2256(8)(C) of title 18, United States Code, contained language that this bill removes. Now, the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" includes not just real depictions, but also simulated obscene exhibitions, covering a range of body parts, whether clothed or unclothed (Section 2256(2)(B)(iv)). This means AI-generated images that mimic real child pornography are now squarely in the crosshairs of the law.

Real-World Impact: Closing the Loopholes

Imagine a scenario where someone creates incredibly realistic, yet entirely AI-generated, images of child sexual abuse. Before this bill, there might have been legal wiggle room. This Act aims to eliminate that ambiguity. For law enforcement, this means clearer authority to prosecute cases involving AI-generated content, even if no actual child was directly involved in the image's creation. For parents, it's a step toward making the digital world a safer place for their kids.

Built-in Resilience

The bill also includes a "severability clause." This is a bit of legal jargon that basically means if a court finds any part of this law unconstitutional, the rest of the law still stands. Think of it as a built-in safeguard to ensure that even if one piece is challenged, the core protections remain in effect. This is a common feature in legislation designed to address complex and potentially controversial issues.