This bill enhances the oversight of foreign manufacturers of compressed gas cylinders used to transport hazardous materials in the U.S., ensuring greater safety and compliance through stricter approval processes, increased transparency, and more thorough inspections.
Troy Balderson
Representative
OH-12
The "Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety and Oversight Improvements Act of 2025" regulates foreign manufacturers of cylinders used to transport hazardous materials in the U.S. It mandates yearly approval for these manufacturers, with a possible 5-year extension for those in good standing, and allows the Secretary of Transportation to deny or revoke approvals based on compliance and transparency concerns. The Act also requires increased transparency and allows for reevaluation of approvals based on public input and expands the reasons for which the Secretary of Transportation may deny approval. Finally, it mandates more thorough inspections and cost recovery for these inspections.
The "Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety and Oversight Improvements Act of 2025" aims to beef up safety for those compressed gas cylinders used to haul hazardous materials around the country. But it's not about all cylinders – this bill specifically targets those manufactured outside the U.S. and used for transport within the U.S. Think of everything from industrial gases to specialized chemicals; these cylinders are everywhere, and this bill wants to make sure they're up to snuff.
The core of the bill revolves around stricter oversight of Foreign Manufacturers of Cylinders (FMOCs). Instead of lengthy approvals, FMOCs will now face yearly reviews, or at best, a 5-year approval if they meet specific criteria, including a clean record under the Tariff Act of 1930 and proving 'good standing'—essentially, a three-year track record of playing by the rules (Section 2). If a company obstructs inspections in any way, they could see their approval yanked. 'Obstructs' is defined pretty broadly here, including anything that "prevent, hinder, or impede an inspection." (Section 2).
Imagine a small business importing specialty gases for manufacturing. They rely on cylinders from an overseas supplier. Under this bill, that supplier faces way more scrutiny. If they've been cutting corners, had penalties, or are on certain government watchlists, they might not even get approved to ship to the U.S. This could mean supply chain disruptions for the small business, potentially increasing costs or forcing them to find new suppliers. On the flip side, if you live near a major transportation route for hazardous materials, the increased inspections and stricter rules could mean a lower risk of accidents. The bill requires annual inspections if there is 'good cause' and allows the government to request records and conduct random testing (Section 2). It's a trade-off: potentially higher costs and tighter supplies for some businesses, versus increased safety for the public.
One big change is how inspections are handled. The bill makes it clear that the U.S. government can recover all costs associated with foreign inspections – travel, time, you name it (Section 2). This could significantly increase the financial burden on FMOCs, and those costs might get passed down the line. The bill also opens the door for public input. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) will post FMOC approval applications online, giving the public 30 days to weigh in (Section 2). While this sounds good in theory, 30 days might not be enough for meaningful feedback, especially on complex technical issues. There is also the issue that the Secretary of Transportation is given broad authority to deny applications, and while there are many valid reasons provided, it could be open to abuse.
This bill builds upon existing regulations, particularly those in sections 178.36 through 178.68 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, which already deal with cylinder specifications. It also ties into broader trade laws like the Tariff Act of 1930. The overall goal is clear: to make sure that hazardous materials transported in foreign-made cylinders are as safe as possible. However, the practical impact could be a mix of increased safety, higher costs, and potentially, some bureaucratic hurdles for businesses involved in international trade.