The Prove It Act establishes a formal process for small businesses to challenge agency claims about the economic impact of proposed rules and strengthens requirements for agencies to consider indirect costs on small entities.
Brad Finstad
Representative
MN-1
The Prove It Act aims to strengthen protections for small businesses against burdensome federal regulations. It establishes a formal process for small entities to challenge agency claims that a proposed rule will not significantly impact them. The bill also expands the required analysis of indirect costs and imposes consequences if agencies fail to periodically review existing rules on time.
Ever felt like government rules were made without really thinking about the little guy? Well, the new 'Prove It Act' is stepping up to give small businesses a bigger voice when it comes to federal regulations. This bill aims to cut through some of that bureaucratic red tape by making agencies more accountable for how their rules impact Main Street.
Right now, agencies are supposed to analyze how new rules might affect small businesses. This bill, under Section 2, beefs that up by requiring them to consider not just direct costs, but also the indirect costs. Think about it: if a new environmental rule impacts a big manufacturer, that manufacturer might pass those costs down to the small businesses that supply them or buy their products. This bill wants agencies to actually factor that into their initial analysis. It specifically amends 5 U.S.C. § 603(b) to include these 'reasonably foreseeable indirect costs.'
Another key change is around agency certifications. If an agency decides a proposed rule won't significantly impact a substantial number of small entities, they have to publish that certification within 10 days of completing it, as per the amendment to 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). No more quietly filing it away.
This is where the 'Prove It Act' really gives small businesses some teeth. Section 2 adds a new process (Section 605A to 5 U.S.C.) where any small entity, group, or organization can petition the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to review an agency's certification. So, if you're a small business owner and you think an agency got it wrong when they said a rule wouldn't hit you hard, you can now formally challenge it. You'll need to provide details like your contact info, specific problems with the certification, supporting data, and even a proposed solution. The Chief Counsel will then conduct a 'prima facie review' to see if your petition has merit. If it does, they'll launch a full review, including a meeting with you, the agency, and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. If the Chief Counsel agrees with you that the rule would have a significant economic impact, the agency then has to go back and perform a full regulatory flexibility analysis. And here's the kicker: if an agency doesn't cooperate with this review, the final rule won't apply to small entities. That's a pretty strong incentive for agencies to play ball.
Ever tried to figure out what a new rule actually means for your day-to-day operations? Agencies often issue 'guidance documents' to explain their rules. Section 3 of this bill amends Section 609 of title 5, United States Code, to require that for any rule likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses, the agency must publish all related guidance documents on regulations.gov (or a similar site). Not only that, but they have to allow the public to comment on these documents. This means you get a chance to understand the nuances and provide feedback before these interpretations become gospel.
Regulations aren't set in stone forever, or at least they shouldn't be. Section 4 amends Section 610 of title 5, United States Code, which deals with periodic reviews of existing rules. Agencies are supposed to review their rules every 10 years. Now, if they miss that deadline, the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA has to notify them that the rule has ceased to be effective. The agency then has to publish a notice in the Federal Register, asking for public comments on why the rule should be reinstated. If they decide to reinstate it, they get 180 days to complete the review. This applies to rules issued in the last five years or any going forward. It’s a mechanism to ensure outdated or ineffective rules don't just hang around indefinitely, potentially costing small businesses time and money for no good reason.
This bill is all about giving small businesses more tools to push back against potentially burdensome regulations, increase transparency, and ensure agencies are really thinking about the real-world impact of their rules. It doesn't authorize any new federal funding (Section 5), meaning agencies will have to adapt their existing resources to meet these new requirements. For anyone running a small business, this could mean a fairer shake when new rules come down the pipeline.