Extends the statute of limitations to 10 years for prosecuting fraud related to specific pandemic unemployment programs and rescinds $5,000,000 from unspent COVID-19 relief funds.
Jason Smith
Representative
MO-8
The "Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act" extends the statute of limitations to 10 years for prosecuting fraud related to specific pandemic unemployment programs. It applies to violations or conspiracies under Title 18 and Title 31 of the U.S. Code and rescinds $5,000,000 from previously allocated funds to offset the budget. The changes made by this law will begin on the date of enactment.
Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 214 | 83 | 127 | 4 |
Republican | 218 | 212 | 0 | 6 |
The "Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act" (SEC. 1) does two main things: it gives prosecutors way more time to go after people suspected of defrauding pandemic unemployment programs, and it claws back some previously allocated funds.
This bill extends the statute of limitations for prosecuting fraud related to several key pandemic unemployment programs—Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation, and a few others—to a full 10 years (SEC. 2). Normally, these kinds of crimes have a shorter timeframe for prosecution. This change applies to a range of federal crimes, like fraud, theft, and money laundering, as long as they're connected to those pandemic unemployment programs. But, if the original deadline to prosecute someone already passed before this law kicks in, this extension doesn't apply (SEC. 2).
The bill also takes back $5,000,000 in unspent funds that were previously set aside by law (SEC. 3). These funds came from section 2118(a) of title II of division A of Public Law 116-136, with some additions from section 9032 of Public Law 117-2. Basically, it's money that was earmarked for something else, and now it's being repurposed.
This legislation is all about cracking down on pandemic unemployment fraud, giving the government a longer leash to prosecute offenders and reallocating some funds. While it's designed to protect taxpayer money and hold fraudsters accountable, there is a real concern that an extended statute of limitations could be used to go after people for small mistakes or honest errors. The rescinding of funds could also be a double-edged sword. It could be beneficial to taxpayers by reducing overall spending, but it might also mean less money available for the programs those funds were originally intended for. The Act goes into effect as soon as it's enacted (SEC. 4).