The "Unemployment Integrity Act of 2025" reforms unemployment compensation by mandating claimant interviews and compliance, enabling employer reporting of noncompliance, requiring audit reports, adjusting the audit program, and setting work search requirements for extended benefits.
Charles (Chuck) Edwards
Representative
NC-11
The "Unemployment Integrity Act of 2025" aims to reform unemployment compensation by requiring claimants to participate in reemployment services and interviews, and by enabling employers to report noncompliance. It also mandates a study and potential increase in random audits to improve the administration of state unemployment compensation laws. Additionally, the Act limits funds transfers for extended unemployment compensation to states that meet specific work search requirements.
The "Unemployment Integrity Act of 2025" is shaking up the rules around unemployment benefits. This bill, signed into law, aims to get people back to work faster and crack down on potential fraud within the unemployment system. Here's the deal.
The core of the Act focuses on making sure people receiving unemployment are actively looking for work and participating in reemployment services. Think mandatory interviews, job search help, and even things like skills assessments or drug tests (if requested). The bill states claimants "must respond to any request...schedule and attend any interview...participate in any reemployment service...and comply with any other reasonable request" (SEC. 2). Basically, if you're getting benefits, you need to be actively engaged in finding a new job, and proving it.
This is where it gets interesting. The Act allows employers to report claimants who aren't following the rules. If someone skips an interview or refuses a job offer, employers can now flag that to the state unemployment agency (SEC. 2). On top of that, the Department of Labor is going to study whether increasing random audits of people receiving benefits helps improve the system. If the study, due two years after enactment, shows positive results, expect more audits (SEC. 2).
For those receiving extended or emergency unemployment benefits, there are additional work search requirements. The Act ties federal funding for these programs to states enforcing stricter rules about proving job search activities (SEC. 3). Basically, states need to get tougher on proving people are looking for work if they want access to the full federal funds for extended benefits. The bill states that no funds can be transferred "unless the Secretary of Labor certifies that the law of such State contains the requirements described in paragraphs (13) and (14) of section 303(a)" (SEC. 3).
Let's say you're a graphic designer laid off due to company downsizing. Under this new law, you must attend any interviews scheduled by the unemployment office and actively participate in any reemployment services they offer, like resume workshops. If a potential employer contacts you for a job, and you don't respond, that employer could report you. This could jeopardize your benefits.
Or, imagine a construction worker facing a temporary layoff. They might be required to take a skills assessment to see if they qualify for different types of work. If a 'reasonable request' is made, say, to take a drug test, and it is refused, this could be grounds for benefit termination.
For a small business owner who had to close their shop, the increased audit possibility adds another layer of scrutiny. While it's meant to catch fraud, it also means more paperwork and potential hassle for those legitimately claiming benefits.
Most of these changes kick in one year after the Act is enacted (SEC. 2 & 3). However, for states with legislatures that meet every two years, the rules apply after the end of their next full legislative session. This staggered approach is meant to give states time to adjust their own laws and systems.
This Act is a clear shift towards tightening the reins on unemployment benefits. The idea is to push people back into the workforce and reduce the burden on the unemployment system. While the goal of preventing fraud and promoting work is understandable, the practical impact could mean more hoops to jump through for those already struggling with job loss. The increased reporting power given to employers, and the potential for more audits, also raise questions about fairness and how these new rules will be enforced in practice.