The Carried Interest Fairness Act of 2025 changes the tax treatment of certain partnership interests related to investment services, reclassifying capital gains as ordinary income and setting stricter rules for those who manage investments.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Representative
WA-3
The Carried Interest Fairness Act of 2025 modifies tax rules for partnership interests, especially for those providing investment management services. It reclassifies certain capital gains as ordinary income for partners providing investment services, and sets rules for valuing partnership interests transferred for services. The bill also includes a 40% penalty for underpayments due to attempts to avoid these new rules. These changes generally apply to taxable years ending after the enactment date.
The "Carried Interest Fairness Act of 2025" just dropped, and it's shaking up how investment managers get taxed. This bill changes the game for partners in investment firms, specifically targeting that controversial "carried interest" – basically, a share of the profits. Here is the breakdown.
This bill fundamentally changes how income from investment services partnership interests is taxed. Instead of enjoying the lower capital gains tax rate, net capital gains are now treated as ordinary income (SEC. 3). Think of it like this: if you're a teacher, your salary is taxed as ordinary income. This bill says the profits from managing investments should be treated the same way. Also, any losses are treated as ordinary losses, but only up to the amount of gains you've already reclassified (SEC. 3). This means you can't use these losses to offset other types of income beyond what you made through carried interest.
For example, imagine a hedge fund manager who previously paid a 20% capital gains tax on their carried interest. Now, that income could be taxed at rates up to 37%, depending on their total income. This change applies to taxable years ending after the bill's enactment (SEC. 3), so it's happening fast.
When a partner gets a partnership interest in exchange for services, the bill sets a clear way to value it: It's what the partner would get if the partnership sold everything at fair market value and liquidated (SEC. 2). This is important because it determines the income the partner has to report. And, generally, they must include it in their income that year (SEC. 2). This prevents some of the fancy accounting tricks that could minimize tax bills in the past.
There are a few key things to watch:
This bill directly hits the wallets of investment managers, particularly those in private equity and hedge funds. It aims to level the playing field, ensuring they pay taxes on their profits at rates similar to other high-income earners. The big question is whether this will change investment behavior, lead to creative restructuring, or simply generate more tax revenue. The broad authority given to the Secretary to issue regulations (SEC. 3) means the specifics could shift, so this is one to watch closely.