The "No Solar Panels on Fertile Farmland Act of 2025" prohibits the use of tax credits for solar energy facilities and equipment placed on prime farmland.
Mary Miller
Representative
IL-15
The "No Solar Panels on Fertile Farmland Act of 2025" restricts federal tax credits for solar energy projects built on prime farmland. It amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude properties on land designated as "prime farmland" by the Secretary of Agriculture from eligibility for residential clean energy, renewable electricity production, energy, clean electricity investment, and clean electricity production credits. This act aims to preserve valuable agricultural land by discouraging the development of solar facilities on fertile farmland.
The "No Solar Panels on Fertile Farmland Act of 2025" aims to reshape how and where solar energy projects get built, specifically targeting the use of federal tax credits. This bill, introduced recently, flat-out prohibits the use of several key clean energy tax credits for any solar installations built on land classified as "prime farmland." This means developers can't claim these credits if they put solar panels on land the government deems best for growing crops. The goal? To protect valuable agricultural land from being converted into solar farms.
The bill doesn't just throw around the term "prime farmland" loosely. It specifically points to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's definition, found in 7 CFR part 657.5. This is the official yardstick, based on soil quality and other factors, that determines whether land is considered top-tier for agriculture. Think of it like this: if your land is graded A+ for growing crops, this bill says it's off-limits for solar projects that want those sweet tax breaks.
Let's say you're a homeowner thinking about going solar. If you live on or near land classified as "prime farmland," this bill could affect your ability to get certain federal tax credits for your installation. Same goes for large-scale solar developers: they'll need to be extra careful about where they plan their projects. For example, a farmer who wants to lease part of their highly productive land for a solar array might find that option is no longer as financially attractive for developers, because the tax credits are off the table. (SEC. 2, SEC. 3, SEC. 4, SEC. 5, SEC. 6)
This bill isn't retroactive; it applies to projects after the date it's enacted. Specifically, it affects:
So, projects already underway or completed before the bill becomes law are in the clear. But anything new on prime farmland will have to factor in the loss of these tax incentives.
While the bill aims to protect valuable farmland, it could also create some headwinds for the solar industry. By limiting where solar projects can be built and still receive tax credits, it might increase the cost of solar energy development. It could also shift development pressure to other types of land, potentially raising land prices or creating conflicts with other land uses. The challenge will be balancing the need for renewable energy with the need to preserve our best agricultural resources. The bill, by design, forces a choice between the two in some cases.