PolicyBrief
H.R. 1068
119th CongressFeb 6th 2025
PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act
IN COMMITTEE

The PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act allows gun manufacturers and sellers to move certain civil lawsuits from state to federal court, where a judge can dismiss the case if it qualifies as a "qualified civil liability action."

Harriet Hageman
R

Harriet Hageman

Representative

WY

LEGISLATION

Federal Courts Could Take Over Gun Lawsuits: New Bill Shifts Power from States

The "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act Federal Jurisdiction Act" (PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act) isn't just a mouthful—it's a potential game-changer in how gun lawsuits are handled. This bill, if passed, lets gun manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations move civil lawsuits out of state courts and into federal courts.

Moving the Courtroom

Currently, if someone sues a gun company in a state court, that’s where the case typically stays. This bill changes that. If the gun industry believes a lawsuit qualifies as a "qualified civil liability action" (a term defined in the existing Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act), they can request to move it to federal court. A federal judge then decides if the case fits that definition and can dismiss the civil action accordingly (SEC. 2).

Real-World Ripple Effects

Imagine a local gun store owner who knowingly, and illegally, sells a firearm to someone with a documented history of violence. If that person later uses the gun in a crime, the victims might sue the store owner in state court. Under this new bill, the store owner could try to move the case to federal court. This shift could have several real-world implications:

  • Different Judges, Different Rules: Federal judges might interpret the law differently than state judges, potentially leading to more dismissals of cases against gun industry defendants.
  • Higher Hurdles for Victims: Federal court can be more complex and expensive to navigate, making it harder for victims of gun violence—who might be dealing with medical bills and trauma—to pursue their cases. It could add extra steps and costs, potentially making it harder for regular folks to hold gun companies or sellers accountable.
  • Undermines State Laws: States have different gun laws and regulations. Allowing cases to be moved to federal court could undermine a state's ability to enforce its own laws. For example, if a state has strong laws holding gun dealers liable for negligent sales, those laws could be sidestepped if cases are moved to federal court and dismissed.

The Big Picture

This bill is about jurisdiction—where lawsuits are heard. But that seemingly technical detail has huge implications. It could shift the balance of power in gun-related lawsuits, potentially making it harder for individuals to hold gun companies and sellers accountable in court. It could create a more favorable legal environment for the firearms industry. It's a subtle but significant change that could affect anyone involved in a gun-related lawsuit, from victims and their families to gun shop owners and manufacturers.