PolicyBrief
H.R. 1058
119th CongressFeb 6th 2025
Directing Resources for Officers Navigating Emergencies Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The DRONE Act of 2025 authorizes the use of Department of Justice grants to purchase and operate unmanned aircraft systems for public safety purposes.

J. Correa
D

J. Correa

Representative

CA-46

LEGISLATION

Federal Grants Can Now Fund Police Drones Under New 'DRONE Act of 2025'

The "Directing Resources for Officers Navigating Emergencies Act of 2025," or "DRONE Act of 2025," greenlights the use of existing federal funds—specifically Byrne and COPS grants—to purchase and operate drones for public safety purposes. This means local law enforcement agencies can now tap into these grants to add drones to their toolkit.

Taking Flight: What the DRONE Act Changes

This bill amends how law enforcement agencies can spend federal grant money. Previously, these grants covered various public safety initiatives. Now, they explicitly include the purchase and operation of unmanned aircraft systems (drones). The stated goal is to boost public safety by giving law enforcement more advanced tools. For example, a police department could use a drone to quickly assess a dangerous situation, like an active shooter scenario, before sending in officers. Or, a search and rescue team could use drones to locate a missing hiker in rough terrain, potentially saving lives by speeding up the search.

Real-World Radar: Potential Upsides and Downsides

While the DRONE Act aims to improve public safety, it's crucial to consider both the potential benefits and the practical challenges. On the plus side, drones could significantly enhance:

  • Crime scene investigation: Providing aerial views and collecting evidence more efficiently.
  • Search and rescue operations: Covering large areas quickly to find missing persons.
  • Monitoring public gatherings: Helping manage crowds and identify potential threats.

However, the bill doesn't lay down specific rules about how these drones can be used. This raises some important questions:

  • Privacy: How will we ensure drones aren't used for warrantless surveillance of everyday citizens? The bill doesn't address data collection, storage, or sharing, which are critical aspects of responsible drone use.
  • Potential for misuse: What safeguards are in place to prevent drones from being used for purposes outside of legitimate public safety needs?
  • Accountability: What happens with the footage that is collected? Who has access to it?

The Bigger Picture: Drones and Existing Laws

The DRONE Act joins a growing landscape of laws and regulations surrounding drone use. It's important to remember that existing laws regarding privacy and surveillance still apply. However, the lack of specific guidelines within this bill (see SEC. 2) leaves room for interpretation and potential inconsistencies in how different agencies implement the technology. The bill doesn't offer clarity on how drone use will be integrated with existing Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

This legislation essentially gives law enforcement a new tool. Whether that tool is used effectively and responsibly will depend on the policies and procedures put in place by individual agencies, and how those policies interact with existing laws and regulations.