The Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act prohibits the federal government from renaming any of the five Great Lakes and nullifies Executive Order 14422.
Debbie Dingell
Representative
MI-6
The "Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act" prohibits the federal government from altering or renaming any of the five Great Lakes. Additionally, the bill formally nullifies Executive Order 14422, which sought to rename Lake Ontario, and prevents the use of federal funds to implement any similar renaming initiatives in the future.
The 'Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act' establishes a permanent federal lock on the names of the five Great Lakes, effectively stripping the executive branch of the power to rename these massive bodies of water. Specifically, Section 2 of the bill prohibits the President, the Secretary of the Interior, and all federal employees from altering or redesignating the official geographic names of Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario. This legislation acts as a statutory firewall, ensuring that the names we use on every map, shipping manifesto, and weather report remain exactly as they are today, regardless of future executive preferences.
A major driver of this bill is the immediate nullification of Executive Order 14422, which was issued on August 27, 2026. That order attempted to rename Lake Ontario as 'Lake America.' Under Section 3 of this act, that executive order is rendered legally void, as if it never existed. For a logistics manager at a shipping company in Rochester or a charter boat captain in Niagara, this means the 'Lake Ontario' designation stays on the books, preventing the administrative headache of updating navigational charts, legal contracts, and business licenses that would have been required by the 2026 name change.
To ensure this isn't just a temporary fix, the bill includes a strict 'no-spend' clause. Section 3(c) prohibits the use of any federal funds to implement or enforce the renaming of Lake Ontario or any 'substantially similar' actions. This means no taxpayer money can be used to print new signs for national parks, update federal databases, or even draft memos regarding a name change. By pulling the plug on the budget, the bill ensures that even if a future administration wanted to try a similar rebranding, they wouldn't have the legal authority or the cash to make it happen.
For the millions of people living in the Great Lakes basin, this bill is about administrative stability. If you’re a small business owner in a lakefront town, your branding and local identity are often tied to these specific names. By prohibiting future redesignations, the bill prevents the trickle-down costs that occur when the federal government changes geographic labels—costs that usually end up falling on local governments and private businesses to update everything from tourism brochures to municipal maps. It keeps the focus on the lakes as we’ve known them for centuries, rather than allowing them to become subjects of executive rebranding.