Prohibits federal funding for any entity that allows individuals to access single-sex facilities that do not align with their biological sex, with exceptions for emergency and law enforcement personnel.
Nancy Mace
Representative
SC-1
The "Stop the Invasion of Women's Spaces Act" prohibits federal funding to any entity that allows individuals into single-sex facilities (like restrooms or locker rooms) that do not align with their biological sex, defined as whether they produce sperm or eggs. Exceptions are provided for emergency medical personnel and law enforcement.
The "Stop the Invasion of Women's Spaces Act" just dropped, and it's going to directly impact how bathrooms and locker rooms operate across the country. This new federal law prohibits any federal money from going to entities—schools, local governments, you name it—that allow transgender individuals to use single-sex facilities that match their gender identity.
This bill isn't messing around with definitions. It defines "biological sex" strictly by whether you produce eggs or sperm. So, if a school, city, or even a private business receiving federal funds allows a trans woman into the women's restroom, they risk losing all federal funding. The only exceptions are for emergency medical personnel responding to calls and law enforcement officers actively pursuing suspects or conducting investigations, as stated in SEC. 2.
Think about your local community center, the public library, or even the DMV—if they get any federal money and have policies allowing trans people to use the bathroom that fits their gender, they'll have to change those policies or say goodbye to that funding. This could mean big budget cuts for some places, forcing them to make tough choices about which services to keep and which to cut. For instance, a city-run homeless shelter that receives federal grants might have to decide between maintaining inclusive bathroom policies and keeping its doors open. Section 2 of the bill makes it clear - comply or be defunded.
Obviously, this directly affects transgender and intersex individuals, who may now be forced to use facilities that don't align with their gender identity. But it also hits the places that serve them—and potentially everyone who uses those services. Imagine a public university that loses federal research grants because of this law. That could mean fewer scholarships, less cutting-edge research, and maybe even higher tuition for all students. The bill's narrow definition of sex could create practical problems, too. How do you actually enforce this? It's not like people carry around documentation of their reproductive system.
This is where it gets tricky. The bill doesn't specify how entities should verify someone's "biological sex." This leaves the door wide open for potentially invasive and discriminatory practices. It also puts a huge burden on organizations to figure out how to comply without violating people's privacy (or other laws). The bill also clashes with many state and local non-discrimination laws, setting up a potential legal showdown between different levels of government. And it completely disregards the complexities of biological sex, especially for intersex individuals who may not fit neatly into the bill's definition. This bill could lead to a lot of confusion, legal battles, and real-world harm, not just for trans people, but for anyone who doesn't fit neatly into traditional gender boxes.