This bill mandates that federal property can only be renamed through an act of Congress and establishes criminal penalties for federal officials who authorize or display unauthorized names on such properties.
Ted Lieu
Representative
CA-36
The Congressional Authorization for Federal Building Names Act mandates that federal properties can only be renamed through explicit acts of Congress. It establishes criminal penalties for politically appointed officials who authorize unauthorized name changes or display incorrect names on federal property. This legislation ensures that the naming of federal buildings remains under the direct authority of the legislative branch.
The Congressional Authorization for Federal Building Names Act is essentially a 'no-touch' policy for the names of federal buildings, parks, and landmarks. The bill mandates that once a piece of federal property is named by a statute, only a new act of Congress can change it. It effectively strips federal agencies and political appointees of the power to swap out signs or rebrand facilities on their own whim, ensuring that names like the 'Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport' or local federal courthouses remain exactly as they are unless a majority of lawmakers agree to a change.
This isn't just a slap on the wrist for bureaucracy; the bill introduces real teeth through 18 U.S.C. § 1370. Starting January 1, 2027, any politically appointed official who 'willfully' displays an incorrect name on federal property or renames it without Congressional approval faces criminal charges. If the cost of the unauthorized change—like replacing high-end bronze lettering or marble engraving—exceeds $1,000, that official could face up to 10 years in prison. For smaller changes under the $1,000 mark, the penalty is still a fine and up to a year behind bars. It’s a clear message to incoming administrations: don't touch the stationery without a vote.
The bill also cleans up some existing legal language to make sure there are no loopholes. By amending 40 U.S.C. § 3102, it specifies that general naming authorities do not apply if a building was previously named by a specific law. For the average person, this means the names of the buildings where you might go to get a passport, visit a national park, or attend a federal hearing won't shift every time a new party takes the White House. It provides a level of consistency, though it could also mean that if a name becomes controversial or outdated, it will take a full-blown legislative effort in D.C. to fix it, rather than a simple administrative update.
One of the most striking parts of this bill is the 'long memory' it gives the justice system. The legislation allows for a 10-year window to prosecute officials who break these rules. This means an appointee who renames a building in their first year of office could still be held legally responsible long after they’ve left government service. While this ensures accountability, the bill’s focus on 'willful' actions means that accidental typos on a temporary sign likely won't land a clerk in jail. The goal is to prevent intentional, high-level rebranding efforts that bypass the legislative process.