This resolution seeks to disapprove and nullify the Environmental Protection Agency's rule regarding California's Low NOX vehicle and engine pollution control standards.
Jay Obernolte
Representative
CA-23
This joint resolution seeks to disapprove and nullify a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding California's stringent motor vehicle and engine pollution control standards, known as the "Omnibus Low NOX Regulation." By exercising disapproval under the Congressional Review Act, this measure prevents the EPA's decision on waiving federal preemption for these California standards from taking legal effect. If passed, the EPA's rule will be entirely canceled.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 258 | 10 | 239 | 9 |
Republican | 273 | 264 | 1 | 8 |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
This joint resolution is a direct legislative hit on a specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule. The main action here is using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to completely nullify the EPA’s recent decision regarding California’s vehicle emissions standards—specifically, the “Omnibus” Low NOX Regulation and the waiver that allows California to enforce rules stricter than the federal ones. If passed, the EPA’s rule would be wiped off the books, meaning it would have no legal effect whatsoever. This is a big deal because it’s Congress stepping in to undo an executive agency’s policy on environmental regulation.
To understand the real-world impact, you need to know what the EPA rule was trying to do. That rule essentially gave California the green light to implement its stricter standards aimed at reducing nitrogen oxides (NOX) from heavy-duty vehicles like semi-trucks and buses. NOX pollution is a major contributor to smog and respiratory illnesses, which is why California—and other states that often adopt its rules—pushes for tighter controls. For someone living near a major trucking corridor or a logistics hub, that EPA rule meant potentially cleaner air down the line. This resolution, by canceling the EPA’s decision, pulls the rug out from under those stricter state-level standards, maintaining the less stringent federal standards for now.
When Congress uses the CRA to strike down a rule, it’s usually welcomed by the industries that would have faced higher compliance costs. In this case, manufacturers of motor vehicles and engines—especially those building trucks and buses—are the primary beneficiaries. The EPA rule would have forced them to invest in new technology to meet California’s lower NOX limits, which translates to higher upfront costs for truck fleets and logistics companies. By disapproving the rule, this resolution provides immediate regulatory relief and certainty for these businesses, allowing them to continue operating under existing, less expensive federal standards.
While this resolution is about regulatory relief for industry, the cost is borne by public health and environmental advocates. States like California rely on these waivers to combat severe air quality issues. If the EPA’s approval is nullified, it undermines California’s ability to enforce its “Omnibus” Low NOX standards, which were designed to drastically cut smog-forming emissions from the transportation sector. For the average person, especially those with asthma or other respiratory conditions, this means the projected improvements in air quality from cleaner trucks could be delayed or canceled entirely. This action is a clear example of how a procedural move in Congress can have a direct, tangible effect on the air quality you breathe every day.