Formally establishes U.S. policy to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its 1991 internationally recognized borders, while condemning Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territories.
Brian Fitzpatrick
Representative
PA-1
This bill affirms the U.S. government's recognition of Ukraine's sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized 1991 borders. It condemns Russia's occupation and annexation of Ukrainian territories as violations of international law. The bill also establishes the official policy of the U.S. government to reject Russia's claims over occupied Ukrainian territories.
This joint resolution locks in America's stance on Ukraine: we recognize the country's full sovereignty and territorial integrity based on its 1991 borders. Think of it like this – everything Ukraine had when it declared independence after the Soviet Union fell, that's what the U.S. officially supports.
The core of this resolution is a firm commitment to Ukraine's internationally recognized 1991 borders. This isn't just symbolic. It means the U.S. flat-out rejects Russia's claims over Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. The resolution calls Russia's actions illegal and a violation of international law, plain and simple.
This part gets a bit more into the weeds of diplomacy. The U.S. government is now officially on the record: it won't acknowledge Russia's claims over any occupied Ukrainian territory, period. This also goes for anything that can be remotely taken for acknowledgment. It is drawing a hard line in the sand. For example, if a map is produced by a government body, it should not denote the territories as part of Russia.
This resolution fits into the broader context of existing U.S. policy and international law, which uphold the principle of territorial integrity. It's about maintaining stability and the rule of law on the global stage. While this resolution doesn't involve direct military or financial commitments, it's a significant diplomatic move that could have long-term implications for the region and U.S.-Russia relations. It is a line in the sand.