PolicyBrief
H.J.RES. 66
119th CongressMar 3rd 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment".
IN COMMITTEE

This bill disapproves and invalidates the EPA's rule that withdrew a technical amendment to Ohio's Air Plan Approval.

Troy Balderson
R

Troy Balderson

Representative

OH-12

LEGISLATION

Congress Nixes EPA's Clean Air Move in Ohio: What It Means for You

Alright, so here's the deal: Congress just threw a wrench in the EPA's gears with a new bill that directly targets an air quality rule affecting Ohio. This isn't just some bureaucratic shuffle – it has real-world implications for anyone who breathes (aka, all of us). Specifically, this bill disapproves the EPA's withdrawal of a 'technical amendment' to Ohio's Air Plan Approval (90 Fed. Reg. 6811), which, in plain English, means they're trying to undo a specific EPA action related to air quality regulations in the state.

Pulling Back the Clean Air Curtain

The core of this bill is all about blocking the EPA's recent move. See, the EPA had pulled back a technical amendment to Ohio's air quality plan. Now, Congress is stepping in to say, "Nope, that withdrawal is invalid." By doing this, the bill essentially puts the original, potentially more stringent, air quality regulations back in play. The bill uses language straight from the rulebook—chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code—to make its point. This language is not just for show; it's the legal mechanism that gives Congress the power to review and potentially overturn actions taken by federal agencies.

Real-World Whiff: Who Might Be Affected?

So, who feels the impact of this? Primarily, industries in Ohio that deal with air emissions. Think manufacturing, chemical plants, and any operation that releases pollutants. If the EPA's withdrawal had stood, these industries might have faced less strict rules. Now, with this bill, they could be looking at tougher, potentially costlier, compliance standards. For the average Ohioan, this could mean a few things:

  • Cleaner Air (Maybe): Tougher regulations could lead to better air quality, which is good news for anyone with asthma, allergies, or, you know, lungs.
  • Job Impacts (Possibly): On the flip side, some businesses might argue that stricter rules make it harder to operate, potentially affecting jobs. It’s a balancing act between environmental protection and economic impact.
  • Everyday Example: Imagine a local factory that has to install new, expensive filters to meet stricter standards. That cost might get passed on to consumers, or it could impact the factory's ability to hire. We will have to wait and see.

The Bigger Picture: Power Plays and Potential Pitfalls

This move by Congress isn't just about Ohio; it's a signal about the ongoing tug-of-war between federal regulations and states' rights. It also raises some questions:

  • Precedent Setting: Could this open the door for Congress to more easily overturn other environmental regulations?
  • Industry Influence: It's worth noting that industries, which might benefit from relaxed rules, often lobby heavily on these issues. And, it's no secret that the Oil & Gas industry, which may benefit from the disapproval of environmental regulations, are top contributors to this bill's sponsor.
  • Long-Term Effects: What does this mean for future EPA actions and the overall push for cleaner air across the country?

In short, this bill is more than just a technicality. It’s a snapshot of the ongoing debate about how we balance environmental protection with economic realities, and it’s playing out right now in Ohio.