This bill renames the Robert E. Lee Memorial, a National Park Service site, to the Arlington House National Historic Site, updating all references in law and repealing previous designations.
Donald Beyer
Representative
VA-8
This bill redesignates the Robert E. Lee Memorial as the "Arlington House National Historic Site." It changes all references to the site in law and documentation to reflect the new name. The bill also repeals the previous resolutions that designated the site as a memorial to Robert E. Lee.
The Robert E. Lee Memorial is getting a new name: Arlington House National Historic Site. This bill wipes the old name from the books, swapping it out for something that reflects its broader history. Basically, any law, map, or document that mentioned the Robert E. Lee Memorial will now say "Arlington House National Historic Site."
The name change isn't just a suggestion; it's a directive. The bill specifically repeals the old joint resolutions from 1955 and 1972 that originally named the site after Lee. This means the National Park Service must update all their materials, and any legal reference has to use the new name. For visitors, this means new signage, updated brochures, and a different name on the website. Think of it like when your friend changes their name on social media – everyone has to get used to calling them something different.
This redesignation is probably most noticeable for the National Park Service, which has to do the legwork of updating everything. Historians might also see a shift, focusing more on the complete story of Arlington House, not just its association with Lee. For the average person visiting the site, it might spark a broader conversation about the history of the place. For example, instead of just focusing on Lee's military career, tour guides might talk more about the enslaved people who lived and worked there, or its role during the Civil War. It's like getting a more complete picture of a historical figure, not just one snapshot in time.
While the bill itself is straightforward, there are always logistical hurdles with any name change. Updating everything takes time and money. But more broadly, this shift reflects a bigger trend of re-examining historical sites and figures, and how we tell their stories. It's a move toward presenting a more complete, and potentially less divisive, account of the past.