PolicyBrief
H.J.RES. 30
119th CongressJan 24th 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".
IN COMMITTEE

This bill disapproves and nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency's rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons, as outlined in the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020.

Neal Dunn
R

Neal Dunn

Representative

FL-2

LEGISLATION

EPA Rule on HFC Phasedown Axed: Bill Nullifies Effort to Reduce Potent Greenhouse Gases

This bill straight-up cancels an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that was designed to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—powerful greenhouse gases often used in refrigeration and air conditioning. The now-dead rule, "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020" (89 Fed. Reg. 82682), was part of the plan to cut down on these planet-warming chemicals.

Scrapping the HFC Phasedown

The core of this bill is a direct disapproval of the EPA's work. By invoking chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, Congress is using its power to essentially say, "Nope, this rule is invalid." The EPA was trying to manage and reduce HFCs under the authority of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. This bill stops that in its tracks.

Real-World Rollback

So, what does this mean for everyday life? Imagine you're a contractor installing HVAC systems. The EPA rule was pushing for a shift to more climate-friendly refrigerants. This bill, however, means businesses can keep using existing HFC-reliant systems without the pressure to switch, potentially saving on immediate upgrade costs. On the flip side, it also means a lot more of these super-polluting gases will be sticking around, contributing to climate change. Think longer-term costs like increased extreme weather events versus the upfront costs of switching to better tech.

Challenges on the Horizon

This move isn't without its headaches. The EPA's now-defunct rule was part of a broader effort to meet international climate commitments. By killing it, there's a real risk of falling behind on those goals. Plus, companies that did start transitioning to alternative refrigerants might find themselves in a weird spot, having invested in changes that are no longer legally required. The bill also sets a precedent: it signals that environmental regulations can be rolled back, even those aimed at implementing existing laws like the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 (which itself is still on the books, oddly enough).