This bill disapproves and nullifies a Department of Homeland Security rule that changes requirements for H-1B visas, F-1 student visas, and other nonimmigrant worker programs.
Jodey Arrington
Representative
TX-19
This bill disapproves and nullifies a Department of Homeland Security rule that changes requirements for H-1B visas, introduces flexibility in the F-1 student visa program, and modifies rules affecting other nonimmigrant workers.
This bill throws a wrench into a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rule that was supposed to modernize the H-1B visa program, offer more flexibility for F-1 students, and tweak some rules for other nonimmigrant workers. By "disapproving" this rule, Congress is basically saying "no thanks" and making it invalid.
The core of this bill is straightforward: it nixes a DHS rule related to several visa programs. The rule was intended to update H-1B visa requirements (those used for specialized workers), add flexibility to the F-1 program (for international students), and make some "program improvements" affecting other kinds of nonimmigrant worker visas. We don't have details on what was in the rule, which makes it hard to say exactly what changes when it is nullified.
Because the details of the DHS rule are not included in this bill, it is hard to nail down the exact impact. However, here are some potential scenarios:
This move creates a lot of uncertainty. Without knowing what was in that DHS rule, it's tough to say who wins and who loses. It could be good news for US workers if the rule made it easier to hire foreign labor. It could be bad news for businesses if the rule streamlined the hiring process. It could affect anything from application backlogs to the availability of certain skills in the US workforce. This could also impact schools with large international student populations, and the students themselves. The bottom line is, that by scrapping this DHS rule, things might stay the same, revert to older regulations, or something else entirely, depending on what was originally in the rule.