PolicyBrief
H.J.RES. 206
119th CongressJul 23rd 2026
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that any Representative or Senator be a natural born citizen.
IN COMMITTEE

This proposed constitutional amendment would require all U.S. Senators and Representatives to be natural-born citizens.

Scott Perry
R

Scott Perry

Representative

PA-10

LEGISLATION

Proposed Constitutional Amendment Would Bar Naturalized Citizens from Congress: New 'Natural Born' Requirement Set for Ratification.

This joint resolution proposes a major shift in who can represent you in Washington by amending the U.S. Constitution to require that every member of the House and Senate be a 'natural born citizen.' Currently, the Constitution only requires this for the President; Senators and Representatives just need to be citizens for nine and seven years, respectively. Under this new proposal, anyone not born on U.S. soil (or meeting the specific legal definition of 'natural born') would be permanently barred from holding federal legislative office. If three-fourths of state legislatures approve this within seven years, the door effectively closes on naturalized citizens seeking these offices.

The 'Natural Born' Barrier

The most immediate impact is a hard ceiling on the 'American Dream' for millions of naturalized citizens. Imagine a small business owner who moved here at age five, served in the military, and spent decades building a community—under this bill, they could never represent that community in Congress. The resolution does include a 'grandfather clause' allowing current non-natural-born members to finish their current terms, but they would be forced out immediately after. This creates a two-tiered system of citizenship where those who earned their status through naturalization are legally sidelined from the highest levels of lawmaking, regardless of their qualifications or years of residency.

Legal Gray Areas and Voter Choice

A significant practical challenge lies in the term 'natural born citizen' itself. Because the Constitution doesn't explicitly define it, we’ve seen messy legal debates in past presidential cycles about whether children born abroad to U.S. parents qualify. By extending this vague standard to all 535 members of Congress, we could see a surge in eligibility lawsuits that tie up the courts and cast doubt on election results. For you as a voter, this means your choice is restricted. If you live in a diverse district and want to elect a representative who shares your immigrant background or specific international expertise, this amendment would take that option off the table entirely.

The Path to Ratification

Changing the Constitution is the 'final boss' of lawmaking, requiring a massive consensus across the country. This isn't just a simple vote in D.C.; it requires 38 states to sign on within a seven-year window. Because this change directly impacts the rights of naturalized citizens—a group that makes up a significant portion of the workforce and tax base—the rollout would likely spark intense debate in state capitals. While the bill aims to standardize eligibility across the executive and legislative branches, it fundamentally rewrites the contract of what it means to be a U.S. citizen, shifting the focus from how long you've contributed to the country to where you were located the moment you were born.