PolicyBrief
H.J.RES. 20
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters".
SENATE PASSED

Nullifies the Department of Energy's energy conservation standards for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters.

Gary Palmer
R

Gary Palmer

Representative

AL-6

PartyTotal VotesYesNoDid Not Vote
Democrat
260132416
Republican
271261010
Independent
2011
LEGISLATION

Resolution Seeks to Block New DOE Energy Efficiency Standards for Gas Tankless Water Heaters

This joint resolution takes direct aim at a specific Department of Energy (DOE) regulation – the one setting new energy conservation standards for the gas-fired instantaneous water heaters many of us know as 'tankless' systems (found at 89 Fed. Reg. 105188). If passed, this resolution would effectively hit the delete button on those new efficiency requirements before they take effect, using a process called congressional disapproval.

Scrapping the Standards: What Changes?

The core action here is straightforward: it prevents the DOE's updated energy efficiency standards for these specific water heaters from becoming mandatory. Think of it like this: the DOE laid out new rules intended to make future tankless gas water heaters use less energy, but this resolution says, "Nope, we're sticking with the status quo." Manufacturers wouldn't be legally obligated to meet the energy-saving targets outlined in that specific federal rule.

The Bottom Line: Costs, Choices, and Conservation

So, what does blocking these standards mean in the real world? For starters, it could affect the water heaters available for purchase. Without the mandate for higher efficiency, manufacturers might continue selling models that use more gas. This could mean slightly lower purchase prices for some units, but potentially higher monthly gas bills for homeowners who install them. It's that classic trade-off: lower upfront cost versus higher long-term operating expense.

On the flip side, this move runs counter to broader energy conservation efforts. Less stringent efficiency standards generally mean higher overall energy consumption and the associated environmental impact. It also throws a wrench in the works for businesses that may have already invested time and money preparing to meet the now-blocked DOE standards, potentially putting them at a disadvantage compared to competitors who didn't make those upgrades.