PolicyBrief
H.J.RES. 173
119th CongressMay 4th 2026
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-02: Reopening Deposit Accounts That Consumers Previously Closed".
IN COMMITTEE

This bill expresses congressional disapproval of the CFPB's rule withdrawing guidance on reopening previously closed consumer deposit accounts.

Gregory Meeks
D

Gregory Meeks

Representative

NY-5

LEGISLATION

Congress Blocks CFPB's Account Closure Rule Withdrawal: What It Means for Your Bank and Your Wallet

Alright, let's talk about something that might actually hit your bank account, or at least how your bank handles it. Congress just stepped in with a joint resolution to disapprove a move by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The Backstory: CFPB and Closed Accounts

So, here’s the deal: back in the day, the CFPB put out something called Circular 2023-02. This was basically guidance for banks and other financial institutions on how to handle it when a consumer wants to reopen a deposit account they’d previously closed. Think about it—maybe you closed an account, then a few months later realized you needed it, or maybe you just made a mistake. This circular provided some ground rules for how that process should work.

Fast forward a bit, and the CFPB decided to withdraw that circular. This meant they were essentially pulling back their specific guidance on reopening closed accounts, potentially leaving banks to figure it out more on their own or revert to older practices.

Congress Says 'Hold Up!': What This Resolution Does

Now, this joint resolution from Congress? It’s a direct slap on the wrist to the CFPB’s withdrawal. By disapproving the CFPB’s decision to withdraw Circular 2023-02, Congress is essentially saying, “Nope, that withdrawal has no legal effect.” (Section 1)

What this means for you and your bank is that the original CFPB guidance on reopening those previously closed deposit accounts is back in play, or rather, it never really left. It’s like the CFPB tried to take a step back, and Congress just pulled them forward again.

Real-World Ripple Effects

So, who’s feeling this? Well, if you’re a consumer who, for whatever reason, might need to reopen an old bank account, this could be good news. It keeps the CFPB’s original framework in place, which likely means a more consistent process for you. (Section 1)

On the flip side, this could mean more headaches for financial institutions. Banks might see increased administrative burdens because they have to stick to the CFPB’s guidance for reopening accounts. Think about the paperwork, the verification steps, and the potential for fraud that comes with reactivating old accounts. (Section 1) For a bank, managing these processes can be costly and complex, potentially impacting their operational budgets.

For example, imagine a small community bank. If they suddenly face more requests to reopen old accounts under specific guidelines, they might need to dedicate more staff or resources to handle these processes, which could divert funds from other services or even lead to stricter verification for everyone to mitigate risk. It’s a classic balancing act between consumer access and institutional burden.

Ultimately, this resolution ensures that the CFPB’s original guidance on reopening closed deposit accounts remains the standard, keeping a specific regulatory hand in how banks manage these situations.