This bill seeks to disapprove the Bureau of Land Management's rule regarding the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision.
Nicholas Begich
Representative
AK
This joint resolution seeks to disapprove the Bureau of Land Management's rule regarding the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision. If enacted, this disapproval would prevent the submitted rule from taking effect.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 259 | 3 | 250 | 6 |
Republican | 272 | 263 | 2 | 7 |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
This Joint Resolution is short, sweet, and packs a massive punch: it uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to completely disapprove of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). That rule concerned the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision. If this measure passes, the BLM’s decision—which laid out the framework for oil and gas leasing in that specific area—will be immediately voided, meaning it will have absolutely no legal force or effect. In plain terms, this bill is a legislative veto, wiping a specific regulatory action off the books before it can be implemented.
Think of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) as Congress’s ultimate 'undo' button for federal agency regulations. When an agency like the BLM finalizes a rule, the CRA allows Congress to pass a joint resolution of disapproval, which, if signed into law, nullifies that rule entirely. This isn't just a pause; it’s a full legislative kill switch. For the everyday person, this matters because it shows Congress directly stepping in to overrule the technical experts at the BLM, who spent time drafting the Record of Decision that this bill aims to scrap. The immediate effect is that the specific leasing program outlined in the BLM’s decision is dead in the water.
When Congress blocks an energy program, the ripple effects hit a few key groups immediately. For the oil and gas industry, this resolution slams the door shut on any immediate plans to lease and develop resources in the Coastal Plain area under the framework the BLM had just established. Companies that were banking on that specific decision moving forward now face regulatory uncertainty and a blocked path to that acreage. This affects their long-term planning and investment strategies.
On the flip side, environmental groups and those focused on conservation benefit directly. The BLM’s Record of Decision likely contained provisions that would have permitted some level of leasing and extraction. By nullifying it, this resolution ensures that the status quo—which is generally more protective of the area—remains in place, preventing the immediate development activities the BLM rule would have allowed. For those concerned about the environmental impact of drilling on public lands, this is a clear win.
Using the CRA is a significant move because it doesn't just stop the rule; it also prevents the agency from issuing a substantially similar rule in the future without specific new authorization from Congress. This creates a long-term regulatory freeze on this specific policy approach. While the bill’s intent is clearly to block energy development in this area, the mechanism itself—the CRA—is a powerful tool that bypasses the usual checks and balances of the administrative process. It shows that when it comes to managing public resources like the Coastal Plain, Congress is willing to directly override executive branch agencies, adding a layer of political risk to the already complex process of developing public lands.