This resolution declares the Trump administration's fossil fuel directives a health and safety emergency disproportionately harming children's fundamental rights by worsening climate change and suppressing climate science.
Janice "Jan" Schakowsky
Representative
IL-9
This resolution declares a health and safety emergency disproportionately affecting children due to prior administration directives that promoted fossil fuels and suppressed climate science. Congress asserts that these actions harm children's fundamental rights to life and a stable environment by worsening climate change impacts. The bill demands the current administration cease policies that increase greenhouse gases and restore access to suppressed climate research. Ultimately, it calls for aligning all energy and climate laws with the duty to protect the rights and future of young people.
This Concurrent Resolution is Congress laying down a marker, essentially giving a public, detailed critique of the previous administration’s energy policy. It’s not a new law, but it’s a powerful statement arguing that the aggressive push for fossil fuels and the suppression of climate science created a “health and safety emergency” that directly harms children and violates their fundamental rights. The text demands that the current administration reverse these fossil fuel-boosting executive orders, restore suppressed climate data to federal websites, and commit to aligning all future climate and energy laws with the protection of children’s rights to a stable climate.
This resolution gets specific about who pays the price for increased emissions: kids. It points out that children’s developing bodies—lungs and brains aren't fully developed until around age 25—make them uniquely vulnerable to pollution. For example, the text cites experts who suggest that the policies being criticized could lead to nearly 196,000 extra deaths over the next 25 years. This isn't just about smog; it’s about increased asthma rates from longer wildfire seasons and a 25% spike in infant mortality on extremely hot days. If you’re a parent juggling work and childcare, this translates to more emergency room visits, lost time at work, and higher medical bills—a direct impact on the family budget tied to environmental policy.
The resolution also calls out the issue of environmental justice, noting that the harm isn't distributed equally. Black, brown, Indigenous, and low-income children are disproportionately affected because they often live closer to polluting fossil fuel sites. This means they bear the heaviest burden of health risks and energy costs. The resolution argues that any policy that ignores this reality is fundamentally unjust, calling for a new system of governance that treats all children equally. For workers in these communities, this resolution is a formal recognition that the policies impacting their health and their children’s futures are a systemic problem.
A major focus is the alleged censorship of climate science. The resolution claims the previous administration directed agencies to remove climate change references from websites and withhold funding for climate research. This is framed as harming students and citizens by denying them access to critical, publicly funded scientific data. The demand here is simple: restore the data. This matters to everyone from high school science teachers who rely on federal data for lessons, to small business owners trying to plan long-term infrastructure investments based on accurate climate projections. The resolution insists that citizens and scientists have a right to access this government research.
While this resolution doesn't have the force of law, it sets an aggressive policy framework for the future. It argues that a stable climate is essential for children to exercise fundamental rights like life, liberty, and property. Crucially, it demands that all future energy and climate laws must align with protecting these rights, and it sets a specific, ambitious target: getting atmospheric carbon dioxide levels below 350 parts per million by the year 2100. This is a very high bar that, if adopted by future legislation, would require massive, rapid shifts away from fossil fuels. For the energy industry, this signals that the political tide is turning, and the focus will increasingly be on the transition to clean energy (solar, wind, electric vehicles) as a matter of constitutional duty rather than just economic choice.