This bill sets the federal budget for 2025, outlines spending and revenue levels for 2026-2034, and directs committees to propose legislation to reduce the deficit.
Jodey Arrington
Representative
TX-19
This concurrent resolution establishes the federal budget for fiscal year 2025, sets budgetary levels through 2034, and outlines specific revenue, spending, and debt targets. It directs House and Senate committees to propose legislation reducing the deficit, with specific targets assigned to each. The resolution also creates reserve funds to address key policy areas like healthcare, tax policy, and regulatory reform, and expresses the House's commitment to economic growth through free-market policies, spending cuts, and deregulation. Ultimately, this budget aims to balance fiscal responsibility with strategic investments in critical sectors.
Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 258 | 0 | 256 | 2 |
Republican | 273 | 267 | 4 | 2 |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Think of this as the government's ten-year financial plan, sketched out. This resolution lays down the proposed spending, revenue, deficit, and debt levels for the upcoming fiscal year (2025) and projects all the way out to 2034 (Sec. 1101). It's not law itself, but a roadmap Congress aims to follow, setting targets like aiming for federal revenues around $3.7 trillion in 2025, climbing towards $5.2 trillion by 2034, while projecting deficits starting near $936 billion and growing to $1.4 trillion over the decade. The plan also anticipates the total public debt reaching over $50 trillion by 2034.
The resolution breaks down spending by category, giving us a glimpse into potential priorities (Sec. 1102). National Defense sees proposed budget authority starting around $933 billion, while areas like Health are budgeted around $949 billion initially, and Medicare near $952 billion. Other categories show different trajectories: Energy funding is projected to decrease significantly over the decade, as are Agriculture and Community/Regional Development. Conversely, areas like Veterans Benefits, Social Security administration, and Net Interest on the debt are projected to see substantial increases. These numbers aren't final appropriations, but they signal intended shifts in where federal resources might be directed.
A major part of this plan involves telling various Congressional committees to find ways to cut the deficit, aiming for a collective $2 trillion reduction over ten years (Sec. 2001, 5002). Think of it as assigning homework: the Agriculture Committee is tasked with finding $230 billion in savings, Energy and Commerce needs to find $880 billion, while Education and the Workforce is looking for $330 billion. Not everyone gets a cut instruction; Armed Services and Homeland Security, for instance, are given room for potential deficit increases. The Ways and Means Committee (which handles taxes) gets a complex task: figure out tax changes that could increase the deficit by up to $4.5 trillion (potentially extending past tax cuts, as hinted in Sec. 3004) but also find a way to raise the statutory debt limit by $4 trillion. If the other committees don't hit that $2 trillion savings target, the Ways and Means committee's allowance for deficit-increasing tax changes gets reduced accordingly (Sec. 4001).
Beyond the numbers, the resolution includes policy statements favoring economic growth through free markets, reduced federal spending (especially mandatory spending), expanded energy production, lower taxes, and significant deregulation (Sec. 5001, 5003). It specifically calls out the growth of federal regulations and promotes initiatives like the REINS Act, which would give Congress more power to scrutinize and potentially block major executive branch rules. Reserve funds are also set up (Title III) to allow budget adjustments for future legislation that aligns with these goals – specifically, bills that reduce regulations (Sec. 3002), cut spending significantly (Sec. 3003), adjust tax policy (Sec. 3004), or aim to protect Medicare/Medicaid (Sec. 3005), provided they meet certain deficit impact criteria.
So, what's the real-world takeaway? This budget framework points towards potentially significant shifts. The focus on deficit reduction via spending cuts could mean less funding down the line for programs in areas like agriculture support, environmental protection, or community development projects. The push for deregulation might mean less paperwork for businesses, but could also translate to changes in workplace safety rules, environmental standards, or consumer financial protections. Tax policy is clearly in the crosshairs, with potential extensions of existing cuts or other reforms on the table via the Ways and Means instructions. While this is just the starting point for the budget process, it signals a clear direction: aiming for a smaller government footprint through spending cuts and deregulation, alongside potential major tax code adjustments, all while navigating a growing national debt.